JMT Private & Partners ← Back to JMT Private & Partners
Two colleagues reviewing a legal document together at a glass conference table
Ownership & Market Access

Can Foreigners Own 100% of a Company in Vietnam? Ownership Limits and Conditional Sectors, Explained

By Tu Nguyen, Founder of JMT Private & Partners · Last reviewed September 2026
Short answer.

Yes, for most business lines. Under Vietnam's 2020 Investment Law, 100% foreign ownership is the statutory default — a local partner or joint-venture structure is the exception, required only in a defined list of conditional or restricted sectors, not as a general rule. Where a sector is subject to conditional market access but has no sector-specific cap set by specialised legislation, the fallback ceiling is 49% foreign ownership. Sectors with their own specific caps include banking (30% aggregate foreign shareholding, with narrower sub-limits by investor type) and film screening services (51%). The starting point for any serious market-entry analysis is therefore not "can I own 100%" but "which of these three categories does my specific business line fall into."

The default position: 100% foreign ownership

Article 9 of the 2020 Investment Law establishes market access for foreign investors on materially the same terms as domestic investors, except where a business line appears on Vietnam's own conditional-sector list or is otherwise restricted by an international treaty Vietnam has signed, principally its WTO Schedule of Specific Commitments. For the great majority of business lines relevant to a new foreign investor — trading, manufacturing, professional and business services, software and technology, most B2B activity — no such restriction applies, and a wholly foreign-owned enterprise (100% foreign-invested) is the default, unremarkable structure, not a special exception requiring separate approval.

This matters commercially because it reverses a common assumption among first-time investors, particularly those arriving from markets where a local joint-venture partner is customary or required. In Vietnam, requiring a local partner is the exception that needs a specific legal basis, not the default that needs to be negotiated around.

Where the exceptions apply — conditional market access sectors

Vietnam's conditional-sector framework operates on three layers, and getting the layering right is the actual technical work in a market-access assessment.

Sectors with their own specific statutory cap. A small number of sectors have a foreign-ownership ceiling set directly by specialised legislation. Banking is the clearest example: under Decree No. 69/2025/ND-CP, aggregate foreign shareholding in a Vietnamese credit institution is capped at 30% of charter capital, with narrower sub-limits depending on investor type — up to 5% for a foreign individual, up to 15% for a foreign non-credit institutional investor, and up to 20% for a foreign credit institution, all counted toward the 30% aggregate ceiling. Film screening services carry a separate, sector-specific cap of 51% foreign ownership.

WTO-scheduled sectors without a further domestic cap. A number of service sectors were opened to foreign investment on specific terms as part of Vietnam's WTO accession commitments — for example, passenger and inland waterway freight transport carries a scheduled ceiling of 49% foreign ownership under Vietnam's WTO Schedule of Specific Commitments.

The residual 49% fallback. Where a business line is classified as conditional market access but no specific percentage has been fixed by either specialised legislation or a treaty schedule, the applicable default ceiling is 49% foreign ownership. This is a meaningful category in practice — it captures conditional sectors that have not yet been the subject of dedicated implementing regulations — and it is often the category first-time investors overlook, assuming (incorrectly) that the absence of a named cap means no cap applies.

How to determine your own sector's cap

The correct sequence for any specific business line is, first, to identify the precise registered business activity against Vietnam's national economic sector classification and check it against Vietnam's WTO and other treaty commitments; second, to check whether specialised domestic legislation sets its own cap for that sector, applying the lower of the two figures where both exist; and third, where a business spans multiple registered activities with different caps, to apply the most restrictive applicable percentage across the combined registration rather than assuming the least restrictive one governs. This is a sector-by-sector legal determination, not a general rule that can be safely assumed from a comparable case in another jurisdiction or even from a similar-sounding business line in Vietnam itself.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is 100% foreign ownership really the default in Vietnam, or is that a simplification?
It is the genuine statutory default under Article 9 of the 2020 Investment Law for business lines outside Vietnam's conditional-sector list and treaty-scheduled commitments — not a simplification, though the specific conditional-sector list itself requires a proper legal check for any given business line.
What happens if my business line has no specific foreign-ownership cap set by law?
If it is classified as conditional market access but has no specific percentage fixed by specialised legislation or a treaty schedule, the applicable default ceiling is 49% foreign ownership, not 100%.
Is the foreign ownership cap on banking really as low as 30%?
Yes, under Decree No. 69/2025/ND-CP the aggregate foreign shareholding ceiling in a Vietnamese credit institution is 30% of charter capital, with narrower individual sub-limits by investor type counted toward that ceiling.
Can a business operate multiple business lines with different ownership caps under one company?
Yes, but the most restrictive applicable percentage across the combined registration should govern the overall foreign-ownership structure, rather than assuming the least restrictive line applies to the whole entity.
Does a 49% or lower ownership cap mean I need a Vietnamese joint-venture partner?
In most cases, yes — where the cap is below 100%, the remaining equity must typically be held by a Vietnamese investor, making a joint-venture structure with a defined local partner a practical requirement rather than an optional preference.
How does JMT Private & Partners help determine which category applies to a specific business?
JMT conducts a sector-specific market-access assessment against Vietnam's national economic sector classification, WTO Schedule of Specific Commitments, and relevant specialised legislation before recommending an ownership and entity structure, as part of its Pre-Investment Feasibility service line.

Written by Tu Nguyen, Founder of JMT Private & Partners. General guidance based on Vietnam's 2020 Investment Law, Decree No. 69/2025/ND-CP, and Vietnam's WTO Schedule of Specific Commitments; sector-specific conditions vary and should be confirmed against your precise registered business activity. Last reviewed: September 2026.

Ready to enter Vietnam with certainty?

Book a free, no-obligation scoping conversation with JMT Private & Partners.

Book a Consultation →